| |
“THE SHACK”
By
Wm. Paul Young
“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the
spirits to determine if they are from God, because many false
prophets have gone out into the world.”
1
John 4:1, HCS
William Paul Young’s best
selling book, “The Shack” presents us with a great story
line full of potential: How do we reconcile the biblical
teachings of God’s grace, mercy, compassion and love with the
most horrific events one might face in this life? The story
itself centers on a man (Mack) whose youngest daughter is
kidnapped, abused and murdered. It is his story of coming to
grips with the death of his daughter – and finding peace with
God. It is an intriguing story line, somewhat well written and
certainly one which could have benefited untold millions.
However, because of its theological poverty and misdirection,
its impact will not be positive.
The first problem is Young’s
treatment of the scriptures. In the book, Scripture is
essentially put on the same level as natural revelation or any
other inspiring human work. It is not considered or presented
anywhere in the story as the authoritative Word of God. Young
undermines the authority of the Bible by using a particular
literary device called misdirection. Whenever Mack begins to
speak a scriptural truth – one of the “trinity” characters will
insinuate that Mack is stating an error – but will never correct
his supposed error leaving more questions than answers.
The second issue of concern has
to do with the presentation of the Trinitarian nature of God.
While the story does – rightly – challenge many of our
particularly western stereotypes of the person of God, it is
terribly lacking in at least two areas. The first has to do
with the idea of metaphor. The Trinitarian nature of God is not
a metaphor. God does not simply reveal Himself to us in a
particular way so that we may accept His revelation. The Bible
teaches us that there is only One God – in three distinct and
eternal persons. However, Young’s idea of the trinity is a form
of the heresy called Modalism which was rejected by the church
in the third century AD. This heresy taught that God appears in
different “modes” (i.e., father, son and spirit) at different
times but that these modes of revelation by no means reveal
separate persons; thus the scars on “Papa’s” hands.
Finally, there is the issue of
Young’s treatment of sin and the atonement. The Papa character
directly tells Mack that God doesn’t punish sin because sin
punishes itself. Also, Jesus’ work on the cross is presented
only as an example of suffering and sacrifice. Yet, we know
that the Bible teaches that God does punish sin. In fact,
Christ’s atoning sacrifice on the cross is payment for that
punishment for those who repent and believe in Him. This is the
very heart of the gospel and must be diligently guarded by all
who love the Truth.
There is certainly more that we
could say about the book. Let me just conclude by saying, don’t
waste your time.
Grace Abundantly, Wes
|
|